I chose the Olympus EM 10 mark 2 over the Sony A6300.....what??

0
0
2072 日 前, 130 観覧
NOTE: This is NOT a thorough review. There were a lot of features not covered, like time lapse options on the Olympus and things like "Live Bulb" mode....both of which I love. Interested in one? Get it here: http://geni.us/oly10mark2A6000: http://amzn.to/2x7oCz4A6300: http://geni.us/WQ8ahHCheck out these lenses that I use with mine: http://geni.us/walkaroundLenshttp://geni.us/teleLensCurious what adapter I use to mount my old Canon FD lenses onto the Olympus, and one that I recommend HIGHLY? http://amzn.to/2iLSs6SCheck out my web site and sign up for the mailing list to get free luts: http://geni.us/R9Y4AuCheck out my kits here: http://geni.us/PCBkitFinal note about video: My explanation about codecs was a little poor. Suffice it to say the ALL-I compression is much better than the IPB compression. ALL-I tends to do better with motion. Both are still compressed formats. And as indicated in the video even the ALL-I option could have a lower bitrate if there isn't too much action in the scene. So this means that your ALL-I videos "could" look poor if not used for the right scene. Also, the XAVC-S is definitely a higher quality codec than the previous one they had in the A6000. I didn't intend to make a false comparison. In fact, there was such an uproar about the A6000 not having that option, that I believe the forums over at Sony, along with other feedback, is why they chose to add it through a firmware update. This is all to say that even the Sony with it's XAVCS codec is still much better than, let's say, a Canon 60D and its compression.

スポンサー

スポンサー

スポンサー